Coordinates are latitude, longitude in decimal degrees (WGS 84).

  1. 67.5058682411507, 12.078192006576986
  2. 67.51513468914455, 12.08493518828732
  3. 67.505804, 12.078177
  4. 67.5073590849653, 12.065177546083532
  5. 67.50935237711703, 12.084637338175526
  6. 67.5072785748648, 12.072763304188811
  7. 67.50584628839933, 12.077602087666037
  8. 67.505771, 12.07731
  9. 67.50612966053433, 12.074917466341276
  10. 67.51753216360989, 12.114710460726673
  11. 67.51502576627564, 12.099781326266452
  12. 67.51505322277606, 12.082958118237343
  13. 67.52692046439114, 12.134788805058633
  14. 67.48222028970501, 12.019300598732787
  15. 67.50991005034938, 12.110892708962865
  16. 67.50984986084315, 12.110492813758242
  17. 67.50960623233921, 12.109119129424357
  18. 67.50612966053433, 12.074917466341276
  19. 67.50877989943199, 12.082291183611119
  20. 67.51821718743378, 12.117007802757826
  21. 67.41091917675902, 11.875391820160075
  22. 67.50747567905728, 12.083485264227988
  23. 67.52603047616184, 12.116234813860393
  24. 67.50965570742511, 12.085232486232371
  25. 67.50577296093608, 12.077057237500298
  26. 67.50889100258605, 12.087050778985486
  27. 67.50910483874873, 12.088263145337805
  28. 67.505863, 12.072722
  29. 67.51778494222596, 12.11458943929938
  30. 67.505771, 12.07731
  31. 67.50912640995175, 12.08772709457594
  32. 67.51726788010984, 12.11567770245449
  33. 67.51791345482529, 12.115440285221894
  34. 67.511252, 12.083094
  35. 67.507714, 12.081874
  36. 67.50080053265681, 12.066739503161816
  37. 67.45048282343647, 11.911102435671523
  38. 67.520036, 12.132255
  39. 67.52902744666709, 12.127879941477193
  40. 67.51849821684506, 12.130003281418027
  41. 67.5071178091331, 12.069237539290157
  42. 67.52464956800205, 12.139828256617875
  43. 67.507636, 12.068234
  44. 67.48387735241747, 12.017714015599713
  45. 67.50738279813508, 12.083240342945007
  46. 67.5084730850169, 12.076840210316163
  47. 67.50838671719423, 12.077734199854604
  48. 67.5256, 12.134419
  49. 67.52193399694453, 12.139066008195858
  50. 67.526949, 12.127019
  51. 67.514288, 12.075469
  52. 67.50852249091419, 12.07791373200564
  53. 67.50943714405636, 12.109510948538968
  54. 67.524461, 12.10574
  55. 67.518296, 12.096267
  56. 67.50698295954241, 12.071960160079946
  57. 67.5172930024261, 12.115247615469684
  58. 67.51467221321533, 12.099594896243843
  59. 67.51741140631233, 12.11193323135376
  60. 67.51511350583986, 12.10016587363475
  61. 67.50835088360375, 12.07496526545674
  62. 67.52708349203935, 12.106192223194057
  63. 67.51759453780637, 12.118640550750229
  64. 67.5049239857241, 12.071401874529215
  • Luciano Fabro’s Il nido/Nest lights up

    © Foto: Kjell Ove Storvik

  • Nest comprises two thick, half-buried cogwheels th

    © Foto: Kjell Ove Storvik

  • Røstlandet

    © Foto: Kjell Ove Storvik

Birds to urns

We see Luciano Fabro’s Il nido/Nest long before we reach it, as it lights up in white from within the Vedøya. The only way to reach it is by boat from Røstlandet. Our boatman tells us about the birdlife while we chug across the water. Several species have been severely decimated in recent years. He blames trawler fishing; it rids the sea of certain types of fish, thereby taking away food sources from certain species of bird. Apparently there are still some birds left in the area. From the hotel terrace in Røstlandet, where we enjoyed a beer while waiting for our transport, we could see a house on the other side of the small bay that appeared to have been almost completely taken over by birds. At least, the façade and roof were in their possession, covered as it was in gooey white droppings. It looked as if someone had dropped several hundred litres of white paint on the roof from a helicopter. The birds also reigned on Vedøya. They sat on small projections on the cliffs, which soared carelessly towards the sky.

The ferryboat had to stop short of the shore due to the long shallows. We continued in a dinghy, in between drifting lumps of seaweed and large rocks that broke the water’s surface. Vedøya is also home to a flock of sheep, which came bleating curiously to meet us. Nest is placed in an obvious location, centrally on the island, where the undulating ground levels out after a small ascent from the water’s edge. Although the shape is by no means flamboyant, Fabro’s glimmering white figure stands out in the green, disorderly terrain. Its symmetrical, classicist character bears witness to a world away from the chaotic bird cries, the stinking sheep and the porous massif surrounding them. The location emphasises the island's stage-like shape – an elevated plateau, open towards the sea, with mountains as a backdrop. But as you continue inland, the terrain soon begins to fall steeply towards a cave-like indentation in the mountain.

Nest comprises two thick, half-buried cogwheels that slope up from the ground. In the crack between them are three bird’s eggs. Both the eggs and the cogs are made from Italian marble. It is not actually cogs we see but slices of fluted Greek columns – self-evident with regard to choice of material. It is no coincidence that an Italian artist was chosen: In 1432 the fishing community on the island of Røst was visited by a group of shipwrecked Italian seamen under the command of the merchant Pietro Querini. Trade links were established. While birds fly south (together with the stockfish produced on Røst), the marble was shipped north. The columns and the eggs represent the two spheres that are encountered here: Mediterranean culture and local birdlife.

Greek columns may be interpreted as metonyms for the Greek city state, polis. As we known, it was here that democracy was born. The democratisation that Athens went through in 400 BC stemmed from a need to adjust the power balance; to deprive the higher social classes of their natural right to exploit the lower. In light of this: what about a democracy extended to also include fauna and geological processes – perspectives that are usually foreign to a politician’s viewpoint? It is perhaps such an inclusive and down-to-earth polis that Fabro’s motif topicalises, in which the bleating, bird cries and slow erosion of the marble's surface are heard. Moreover, the cog form that appears as the columns are transformed into protected forms, thus depicting a sense of care for nature – and literally embodies it in the vote-casting assembly – indicates that such an intention to protect is always also instrumentally motivated. One hundred percent moral management of nature is unthinkable. That would require us to be liberated from it. The extent to which the eggs are actually protected by the ambivalent column cogs, or are about to be squeezed, is an open question.

Nest was the target on our route that required the greatest effort to view. It took us a whole day: we had to take the morning flight from Bodø to Røstlandet, where we waited three hours for the boatman. Back in Røstlandet after our excursion to Vedøya, we waited several hours for our return flight back to the mainland. It was a lot of resources to expend on seeing just one piece of art. Not that this is unusual; people frequently seek out remote destinations in order to see art. This ability to mobilise people to move is one of the most distinctive aspects of contemporary art; it makes its audience travel around on an eternal, global journey. To be professionally involved in contemporary art at a certain level entails being constantly on the move, from event to event, exhibitions, biennales, openings, panels, seminars, workshops. 

Nest embodies the ambivalent relationship between people and nature while also emphasising its insistent placement outside the function of mainstream art, like mobilising pieces (cogs) in the global migration of people, goods, capital. Contemporary art is a “global object”. No matter where it is located, it never belongs. Even a demonstratively localised work such as the one presented here by Fabro, half buried so as to avow that it is here that it belongs, has circulation as a motif, destiny and effect. A mobility and ability to change corresponding to those demonstrated by art and its practitioners, collectors and communicators, are, however, not found in all species.


Stian Gabrielsen, in Skulpturlandskap Nordland, Uten tittel forlag 2017. Reproduced with the publisher's permission.

Translation to English: Alfatekst oversettelser

Facts:

  • Completed 1994
  • Carrara marble

Two column fragments diameter 85 cm, height 25 cm, and eggs' diameter 25 cm
From: http://www.skulpturlandskap.no/artwork/the-nest

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Artscape_Nordland

Photo Kjell Ove Storvik